Labour and the Lib Dems are leafleting Putney over council tax. Only one has its figures right

Labour’s slower rises clash with its own budget. The Lib Dems’ ‘misled’ charge clashes with the Conservative manifesto.
Political party leaflets over council tax rise
Labour and Lib Dem leaflets over council tax rise

Labour and the Liberal Democrats have both delivered leaflets to homes in Putney this week, each blaming the Conservatives for the council tax rise due next April.

Tested against the council’s own papers, on the A to E scale used to check the Conservative, Labour and Green manifestos before May’s election, Labour’s leaflet scores a C and the Lib Dems’ a B.

The Lib Dems get every figure right but call the Conservatives dishonest over a manifesto that warned council tax would more than double. Labour’s figures do not hold up, and it has not published the £45m plan its leaflet rests on.

The council plans to raise its share of a Band D bill by 188%, from £510 to £1,468. With the Mayor of London’s share added, the whole bill goes up by 94%, or £958 a year, about £18 a week. Full Council takes the final decision in March.

So which leaflet tells you the truth about why?

Wandsworth Labour · Leaflet, November 2026 · “Conservatives announce Britain’s biggest ever Council Tax rise”
C
Overall: Needs context The attacks on the rise and the cuts are mostly accurate. The alternative the leaflet rests on is not: Labour has not published the £45m plan, its own budget paper showed the tax take nearly doubling, and with every Labour assumption granted at least £126m a year is still unaccounted for. Cllr Hogg replied but did not supply the costing.
😇 5 Accurate
🙂 4 Mostly accurate
😐 4 Needs context
😬 3 Misleading
🤡 0 Not accurate
⚪ 1 Unverified
😬 Misleading
😬 D
“A costed plan of £45m of budget reductions without service cuts”
The £45m Transformation Programme existed, but the council had identified £14m of it by February and the then Chief Executive called the £45m “a broad, reasonable aspiration to get us going”. Asked for the costing on 15 September and 9 November, Cllr Hogg said Labour “found an initial £45m in savings last year” with officers and that demand growth would be held at the 2025/26 baseline. No document has been supplied.
Paper 26-63 (Feb 2026) · Finance Overview and Scrutiny Committee 18 Feb 2026 · Cllr Hogg statement 9 Nov 2026 · putney.news 19 Feb 2026, 24 Sep 2026
😬 D
“There is no reason to make this tax rise so sudden”
Labour’s own February budget paper had the amount raised from council tax rising from £76.6m to £143.2m by 2027/28. The council’s September chart shows a 5% a year path running reserves below zero in 2029. A gentler path did exist, at a one-off cost of £33m to £66m, so the claim is overstated rather than false.
Paper 26-63 · Council budget report 15 Sep 2026 · putney.news 22 May 2026, 14 Oct 2026
😬 D
“Residents are being asked to pay £140 million a year now to cover a shortfall which will rise to £84m by 2030/31”
The council’s figures are £143m a year to raise from council tax by 2030/31, of which £84m is the government funding cut; the rest is the council’s own gap, which Labour’s February paper put at £137m. Asked to clarify, Cllr Hogg restated the comparison with the figure changed to £130m and said “something doesn’t add up”. Setting the government cut alone against the whole sum leaves out the half of the gap Labour’s own paper identified.
Council budget report 15 Sep 2026 · Paper 26-63 · Cllr Hogg statement 9 Nov 2026 · putney.news 19 Feb 2026, 15 Oct 2026
😐 Needs context
😐 C
“Left the council with zero external debt”
True on the accounts: the council had no external borrowing at March 2025 or March 2026. It was borrowing internally from its own reserves, £129m by March 2025 and £166m by December 2025, which the leaflet’s debt comparison leaves out.
Statements of Accounts 2024/25 and 2025/26 · putney.news 7 Dec 2025
😐 C
“High reserves and zero debt: reserves £673m”
£673m is the total usable reserves figure at 31 March 2026, down from about £780m two years earlier. Only £16.9m of it is the General Fund balance; the rest is earmarked, housing, major repairs and capital grant money that cannot fund the day-to-day budget.
Statement of Accounts 2025/26, Movement in Reserves Statement and usable reserves note
😐 C
“Stopped funding school breakfast clubs”
The council has ended its own breakfast club funding and says provision moves to the national scheme. Whether every school keeps a club is not yet known.
Cabinet savings decisions · putney.news 12 Oct 2026
😐 C
“Independent auditors recognised Wandsworth’s strong financial position”
The external auditors, EY, found no significant weakness in the council’s financial sustainability arrangements for 2024/25. They did find one significant weakness, in governance, over the housing regulator’s C3 grading, and they had disclaimed their opinion on the 2022/23 and 2023/24 accounts for lack of assurance over reserves. Auditors report by exception; “strong financial position” is Labour’s phrase, not theirs.
EY, Audit results report 2024/25, 23 Feb 2026 · EY audit results report 2023/24, 26 Feb 2025 · Audit Committee 12 Nov 2025
🙂 Mostly accurate
🙂 B
“Britain’s biggest ever Council Tax rise”
At 188% on the council’s share, it is the largest single-year rise by any English council since council tax began in 1993. We have not tested Scotland or Wales.
Council budget report 15 Sep 2026 · putney.news 20 Sep 2026
🙂 B
“That will leave the average family £958 worse off every year”
£958 is the rise in the council’s share of a Band D bill. Most Wandsworth homes are not Band D, so the average household figure differs; the council put the average rise at about £1,000 on the total bill.
Council budget report 15 Sep 2026 · putney.news 16 Sep 2026
🙂 B
“Two cabinet members have resigned, with one citing serious ethical concerns”
Two cabinet members resigned in July 2026. The words quoted were “profound ethical and professional concerns about our new leadership”; the leaflet paraphrases them.
putney.news 18 Jul 2026, 20 Jul 2026
🙂 B
“Cancelled support for local charities”
The council suspended its grants fund for four years as part of the savings plan. It has not cancelled all support for charities.
Cabinet savings decisions · putney.news 12 Oct 2026
😇 Accurate
😇 A
“Keep Council Tax the lowest in the country”
Wandsworth’s council tax was the lowest in England throughout Labour’s term, confirmed in our April check of Labour’s record.
putney.news 19 Apr 2026
😇 A
“Doubling the cost of Council Tax”
The total Band D bill rises 94% in April 2027; the council’s share rises 188%. On the most favourable reading, the bill nearly doubles.
Council budget report 15 Sep 2026 · putney.news 20 Sep 2026
😇 A
“Ended our status as a Borough of Sanctuary for refugees”
Cabinet ended the Borough of Sanctuary commitment as part of the October savings decisions.
Cabinet decisions Oct 2026 · putney.news 12 Oct 2026
😇 A
“Scrapped free Bulky Waste collections”
Free bulky waste collections ended and a charge was introduced under the savings plan.
Cabinet savings decisions · putney.news 12 Oct 2026
😇 A
“One leader has resigned after 44 days”
Aled Richards-Jones was confirmed as Leader at the annual council meeting on 27 May 2026 and resigned on 10 July 2026: 44 days.
Council annual meeting 27 May 2026 · putney.news 28 May 2026, 10 Jul 2026
⚪ Unverified
⚪ ?
“Neighbouring boroughs’ reserves and debt (Kingston, Richmond, Lambeth, Kensington and Chelsea)”
Partly checked. Richmond’s figures match its accounts at 31 March 2026, the same date as Wandsworth’s: usable reserves £158m, borrowing £106m. Lambeth’s match no single year: £262m was its usable reserves figure for April 2024 (restated), and its borrowing at March 2026 was £1,139m against the leaflet’s £1,129m. Kingston and Kensington and Chelsea not checked.
Richmond Statement of Accounts 2025/26 (unaudited, 30 Jun 2026) · Lambeth draft Statement of Accounts 2025/26 · Needs: Kingston and Kensington and Chelsea accounts at 31 March 2026

Unverified claims. One claim remains unverified: the neighbouring boroughs’ figures, where Richmond’s figures match its 31 March 2026 accounts but Lambeth’s match no single year, and Kingston and Kensington and Chelsea have not been checked. One further claim, about a named councillor’s past, is not graded here; it needs its own verification and right of reply. Cllr Hogg responded on 9 November; his response is reported in the story. He did not supply the costing.

Labour: C

The leaflet’s alternative rests on “a costed plan of £45m of budget reductions without service cuts”. Asked for the costing in September and again this week, Labour has not provided it.

We put six questions to Cllr Simon Hogg, Wandsworth Labour’s leader, who signed the leaflet. On the plan, he said Labour “examined budgets carefully with officers and found an initial £45m in savings last year before Fair Funding was confirmed, with more to come”. He added: “Directors agreed that demand growth must be contained at the 2025/26 baseline.”

Labour’s own budget from February, written while it ran the council, called £45m the programme’s “initial ambition”. It had found £14m of savings; the other £31m were “to be developed further”. The council’s then chief executive, Andrew Travers, described the figure that month as “a broad, reasonable aspiration to get us going”.

The leaflet also says “there is no reason to make this tax rise so sudden”. Cllr Hogg said Labour “would not come back to local people for more taxes until we had exhausted every avenue internally”. Its February budget had the amount the council needed from council tax rising from £76.6m this year to £143.2m in 2027/28, nearly doubling in a single year. The council’s September report found that 5% rises, the path Labour now proposes, would not close the gap and “would exhaust the Council’s reserves fully within two years”.

One sentence on the leaflet does not match the council’s figures: residents, it says, are being asked to pay “£140 million a year now to cover a shortfall which will rise to £84m by 2030/31”. In his reply Cllr Hogg put it as “an extra £130m upfront and every year to cover a shortfall of £84m in year three. Something doesn’t add up.” The council’s figures are an extra £132m in 2027/28, rising to £143m by 2030/31, against a government cut that reaches £84m a year by 2028/29.

Where Labour is right

On his wider point, the council’s own figures back him up. The government’s cut does not explain the whole rise. It accounts for £84m of the extra £143m a year, and without it the council’s share of the bill would still rise by about three-quarters.

Cllr Hogg did not answer our other questions: how rises of 5% a year square with Labour’s own February budget, how much of the £673m of reserves on the leaflet’s map could pay for day-to-day services, and whether its claim of zero debt counts the money the council has borrowed from its own reserves.

His main argument is that the rise is a choice. “The Wandsworth Tories don’t need to double your Council Tax, it is a political choice,” he said. Labour opposed the government’s funding changes, he said, and “will keep pressing for more government funding for Wandsworth”. He said more than 12,000 people had signed Labour’s petition, and that for many families “this sudden blow will mean no summer holiday, their car not being fixed – or them having to leave the area”. Residents’ message, he said, is that “the increase is far too large, it should be split over multiple years, and the most vulnerable must be protected”.

He also made three new claims about the Conservative plan. He said it would “raise taxes now, cut them before the next election”. The published plan does not include a cut: it raises the council’s share once, in 2027/28, then holds it for three years. But council tax is set each year, so the plan cannot rule a cut out.

He said it “includes just 2% in council-wide efficiency savings for 2029/30”. It has £25.4m of new savings due that year, more than in any other year, and nothing in the council’s report puts them at 2%. He is right that it adds “more than £100m a year to budgets by that stage”, though most of that is inflation (£65m) and rising demand (£22m).

Wandsworth Liberal Democrats · Leaflet, November 2026 · “Dear neighbour” / “Conservatives are increasing your council tax by a record-breaking 94%”
B
Overall: Mostly accurate Every figure is the council’s own and is right. The charge of a dishonest pledge is not supported: the Conservative manifesto told voters council tax would more than double. The leaflet offers no plan of its own for the gap.
😇 4 Accurate
🙂 0 Mostly accurate
😐 2 Needs context
😬 1 Misleading
🤡 0 Not accurate
⚪ 0 Unverified
😬 Misleading
😬 D
“They knowingly misled voters at this year’s local elections by promising to keep council tax low”
The Conservative manifesto pledged to keep tax “as low as possible” in the same sentence that said Labour’s budget gap “will make your Council Tax more than double”, and warned that the government’s model allowed large rises only after May’s elections. Whether voters were misled about the size of the rise is contradicted by the document itself; the motive cannot be tested.
Wandsworth Conservatives manifesto 2026, p.2, p.6, p.9
😐 Needs context
😐 C
“The Conservatives stood on an election pledge to keep council tax low and protect local services”
The pledge was to keep tax “as low as possible”, alongside the warning of a doubling. The services pledge was to protect “core services”, which the manifesto defined as weekly bins, street sweeping, fly-tipping and graffiti removal, narrower than “local services”.
Wandsworth Conservatives manifesto 2026, p.2, p.9
😐 C
“The Lib Dems are holding the Conservative Council to account”
The Liberal Democrats won no seats in May 2026 and have no councillors; the council is 29 Conservative, 28 Labour and one independent. The party is campaigning from outside the chamber.
Wandsworth Council election results May 2026 · putney.news 29 Aug 2026
😇 Accurate
😇 A
“Nearly doubling your council tax by a record breaking 94%”
The total Band D bill rises 94% in April 2027, the largest single-year rise by an English council since council tax began.
Council budget report 15 Sep 2026 · putney.news 20 Sep 2026
😇 A
“An increase of £958 per year for residents living in a Band D property”
£958 is the rise in the council’s share of a Band D bill in the council’s September report.
Council budget report 15 Sep 2026 · putney.news 16 Sep 2026
😇 A
“Planning millions of pounds in cuts to local services”
The council’s savings plan totals £79m over the period, including breakfast clubs, grants, the Borough of Sanctuary and free bulky waste collections.
Cabinet savings decisions · putney.news 12 Oct 2026
😇 A
“Changes to local government funding were announced almost two years ago”
The government’s Local Government Finance Policy Statement of 28 November 2024 announced the funding reform: the Fair Funding Review, the business rates reset and multi-year settlements from 2026/27. That is just under two years before the leaflet. Wandsworth’s own figure was not known until the autumn of 2025.
MHCLG, Local government finance policy statement 2025 to 2026, published 28 Nov 2024 · Fair Funding Review 2.0 consultation, 20 Jun 2025

Unverified claims. Every claim on the leaflet could be tested against a document. The Liberal Democrats were asked on 9 November for a response and had not replied at the time of writing.

Liberal Democrats: B

The Lib Dem leaflet gets every figure right. The 94% rise and the £958 a year for a Band D home are the council’s own numbers. The government did first announce the funding changes almost two years ago, on 28 November 2024.

Its charge is that the Conservatives “knowingly misled voters” by “promising to keep council tax low”. The Conservative manifesto told voters something else. It said Labour’s budget black hole “will make your Council Tax more than double”, and promised to keep tax “as low as possible”. The party’s manifesto page still says the council’s figures “project a council tax rise of 178% in the coming years”.

The leaflet says the Lib Dems are “holding the Conservative Council to account”. The party has no councillors on Wandsworth Council. Nor does the leaflet say what it would do instead: it asks readers to fill in a survey about which services to protect.

We put our questions to the Liberal Democrats on Monday. They had not responded by the time of publication.

Council tax, April 2027

Where the rise comes from, and who is paying for what

All figures are yearly amounts by 2030/31, the fourth year of the council’s plan.

1. What the council says it has to cover

  • £84mGovernment funding cut £563 of a Band D bill
  • £65mInflation £435
  • £41mSpending plans inherited from Labour £275
  • £24mRising demand for care and housing £161
  • £8mNew Conservative spending £53

2. Which of those costs does each party’s plan pay for?

Conservatives, in power“The minimum level of reserves needed”
All of itCounts every cost, including inflation at 3.2% and a £76m reserves floor it has not explained. Pays with £79m of cuts and £143m of council tax, in one go.
Labour, opposition“A costed plan of £45m”
Inflation, inherited plans, demand: not addressed
£96mTreats the problem as the government cut. Pays with 5% tax rises (£17m), £45m of savings it has not published, and by assuming no growth in demand and lower inflation. At least £126m of the council’s costs is not addressed. Asked for the costing, Labour has not provided it.
Liberal Democrats, no councillors“Dishonest election pledge”
No plan offered
NoneSays the Conservatives broke a pledge; the manifesto it attacks told voters council tax would “more than double”. Proposes nothing for any of the costs.

Sources: Wandsworth Council budget report, 15 Sep 2026 (the council’s chart of costs to 2030/31); Statement of Accounts 2025/26; Wandsworth Conservatives manifesto 2026; Labour and Liberal Democrat leaflets and Cllr Hogg’s statement, 9 Nov 2026; putney.news, 14 Oct 2026. Band D figures: each £1m is about £6.70 on a Band D bill. Labour’s £96m: 5% rises £17m, savings £45m, demand held at 2025/26 level £24m, inflation at 2.5% £10m.

What the rise is paying for

Neither leaflet tells readers what the money is for. The council’s own breakdown puts the extra costs at £222m a year by 2030/31: the £84m government cut, £65m of inflation, £41m of spending plans inherited from the previous Labour administration, £24m of rising demand and £8m of new spending, mostly on extra police and street cleaning. It plans to cover them with £79m of savings and £143m more council tax.

Grant Labour every assumption in its leaflet and in Cllr Hogg’s email, and its plan covers at most about £96m of that £222m: roughly the government cut and little more. Some of that may be counted twice, because £14m of the £45m had already been taken out of the budgets the council’s figures start from.

What happens next

Full Council decides the 2027/28 council tax in March. Your ward councillors will vote on it, and you can find them and their contact details on the council’s website.

The council’s full plan, with the breakdown above on page 34, is in its Spending Review report. You can check which band your home is in on the council tax pages.

Every grade on both leaflets is explained in the scorecards above, with its source. How we score sets out the scale.

Total
0
Shares
1 comment
Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Posts
Total
0
Share